Friday, April 26, 2013

Abortion Or Murder?




On April 15, 2013 an article was publish on The Dallas Morning News about a disturbing case of abortion which turned out to really be MURDER. Dr. Kermit Gosnell, is on trial in Philadelphia for killing a woman and seven babies at his abortion clinic. Dr. Gosnell's employees said that he continuously offered abortions after 24 weeks. Which is illegal in the state of Pennsylvania,  also along with him 8 out of 9 of his employees were convicted of third degree murder. If Gosnell is found guilty he will be receive the worst punishment possible.

This situation can be mistaken for many different actions, besides his intentions of the steady pay of these illegal actions, this is also a case of "medical malpractice" i'm sure he knew the implications of these procedures, but didn't think it would ever see the "light." I feel that this is mostly his fault, but also the department of heath should be held accountable and these patientsalso. The patients should know the rules and regulations on abortions in their state. It seems like he was try to also please his customers, but having killed 7 babies and a woman someone should have found out about this or even told before it reached that outrageous amount. The government should install a process you go through before getting an abortion which   makes you submit your sonagram/pregnancy week stages that dictate whether you can get an abortion or not at the current time. This would limit and restrict this from happening again. In abortion clinics the department of health is suppose to check out the facility and make sure that its sanitary and subject for these type of procedures annually. His clinic had been checked once and got approval during the beginning of the situation which means they were either not checking carefully, or didn't care to check carefully. The government has to be aware of things like this, I feel like Dr.Gosnell should be held fully responsible for his actions and these illegal performances. At the same time the "DOH" should also be punished in some time a way for not checking the facility in 17 years, and allowing approval for employees to work and patients to be operated on in these types of environments.

"Outrage can be rightly focused from all sides on the frightening lack of oversight of Gosnell’s clinic, which was not inspected by state officials for 17 years. Gosnell’s case was finally brought to light not because someone was so appalled by the alleged brutality occurring inside his clinic, but because the FBI raided the pill mill he is accused of having operated next door.

The 2011 grand jury report that prompted these charges said: “Gosnell’s clinic — with its untrained staff, its unsanitary conditions and practices, its perilously lax anesthesia protocols, its willingness to perform late-term abortions for exorbitant amounts of cash, and its routine procedure of killing babies after they were delivered by their unconscious mothers — offers a telling example of how horrendous a Pennsylvania facility can be and still operate with DOH ‘approval.’"- Dallas News



Friday, April 12, 2013

Glivec the cancer cure.


On Friday, April 5th, 2013. Joey Lund created a interesting blog on Novartis which is a pharmaceutical company that offers: innovative medicines, vaccines, eye care, diagnostic tools, over the counter medicine and animal health car products. The blog contained brief information on the cancer treatment called "glivec" and how it was intended to be a global product. Her blog was well constructed, but its just lacked a bit of information on the insight of what the medicine was all about and how it was being used in India and other countries. I didn't really get the overall objective of a point that was trying to be proven in the blog, but it was creative and something unique.

Novartis attempted  patented glivec, but was denied by the supreme court of the worlds largest democracy India. India rejected its medical innovation, saying that glivec wasn't a new medicine but an amended product of its earlier version. India being the largest pharmaceutical supplier for general medicicines as stated in Joey's blog, closely identified the medicine and basically incinuated that glivec wasn't advanced enough to be patented in their country. I could see how this could be, as India feels like its" top cheif" in the global medicine production and wont settle for anything other than great. Glivec, which is a life saving medicine for certain forms of cancer is patented in just about 40 countries, Russia, China, and Taiwan just to name a few. It is given free to just about 99% of its patients, through novartis oncology access program. "Novartis has never been granted an original patent for Glivec in India. We strongly believe that original innovation should be recognized in patents to encourage investment in medical innovation especially for unmet medical needs," said Ranjit Shahani, Vice Chairman and Managing Director, Novartis India Limited. "We brought this case because we strongly believe patents safeguard innovation and encourage medical progress, particularly for unmet medical needs. This ruling is a setback for patients that will hinder medical progress for diseases without effective treatment options."-Novartis.com

 "Where there is no patent protection there is no investment.  And where there is no investment there is no innovation.Minus patent protection, an innovator company can't earn back what it invested in R&D, ergo they can't reinvest their profits in further R&D—further delaying crucial incremental innovation, which is how medical progress is made"- Noah Pines

Overall, I feel as if her blog was good and it was something new about whats going on in other countries.